Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Brian Lincoln's avatar

Sorry for the rant. I started typing and this came out.

I understand the notion of controlling yourself or else others will control you. But I have issue with where this all stops. There is a fine line between living to be courteous and living your own life. If you find yourself in the midst of several neighbors who are triggered by anything outside of their immediate control, you will be living the life they want you to live if courtesy is the primary driver of your behavior.

You think wearing a face mask for COVID control is "insane" but as you know there are millions of fanatics who believe otherwise. Why is it ok to not be courteous to them (calling them insane) when being so will provide for peaceful coexistence? Because, IMO, it is really about values and not about laws. About respect of the individual leading to a courteous existence. Life is more uncomfortable the greater the divide in our values and the more comfortable the more our values are in alignment.

The question of the times is how do we come into better alignment on values when there is no overriding central motivator or common belief? For so many the government has replaced God/religion and personal responsibility. IMHO we should be working to identify the basic human needs and extrapolate them to encompass a humanistic philosophy that is totally inclusive and impossible to deny (not by law but rather by rational, natural logic). I think this approach gets to your "doing what we know to be right" comment in an agreed upon manner. Much thought on this has already been done, it needs a grassroots movement to get it established. I think there is a growing population that is willing to look at life amongst humans in a different way, a way with a long-term future. The ways of the world have changed. Whether we accept it or shape it is up to us but not for long.

Expand full comment
Dollyboy's avatar

Certainly true. The age of consumerism and globocap has produced individuals that care more about what they can get and how much power over others they can amass. In bygone times folks were more community oriented because community was NECESSARY for life, now you can go it alone if need be - shopping, Uber eats to the door, private transport, work from home, internet shopping, social media etc. all facilitates this separation. We don’t need others and have lost the ability to negotiate. Wokism and cancel culture has only sought to further this divide. Of course the problem arises when we don’t agree that the behaviour in question is causing any problem. But again ... this is where the ability to negotiate comes in useful. As the currently unfavourable writer, on accounts of his birthplace, says: “Every one is really responsible to all men for all men and for everything.” - Dostoyevsky.

Expand full comment
5 more comments...

No posts